Why Tony Burke is no friend of the Muslim Community
On the 19th of January, 2025, Police were tipped off to a caravan with explosives. After arriving on the scene, The Australian Federal Police (AFP) said it knew “almost immediately” that it was fabricated. The fabricated plan was to: organise for someone to buy a caravan; place it with explosives and written material of antisemitic nature; leave it in a specific location; and then, once that had happened, inform law enforcement about an impending terror attack against Jewish Australians.
Tony Burke was briefed by the Australia Federal Police (Source: ABC National Drive). He admitted knowing about the fake explosives caravan. Despite this knowledge, he kept silent. While some may argue Burke remained quiet to protect the police investigation, his subsequent actions and choice of rhetoric reveal a troubling narrative. Burke deliberately employed specific language, phrases, and tropes that stoke fear and deepen divisions. Burke engaged in the following:
He introduced the harshest federal anti-hate laws (Source: ABC News) on the 6th of February despite knowing the truth. There is a false idea that it wasn’t only NSW and Chris Minns that introduced new hate laws.
He broke Labor’s long-held stance by enforcing mandatory sentencing (6 years minimum for terror acts), even though he knew the caravan was fictitious.
On January 23, Burke appeared on ABC’s 7:30 Report. He passionately condemned hate, radicalisation, and lone-wolf attacks—the very tropes often unjustly linked to Muslim communities—all the while fully aware the caravan story was fictitious. Yet again, he explicitly highlighted antisemitism five times without acknowledging Islamophobia, sending a clear and divisive signal.
While some may claim these laws were designed to protect all Australians equally, Tony Burke’s own words reveal troubling biases beneath their surface. When a minister speaks forcefully on security-related issues without explicitly reassuring vulnerable communities, there emerges an implied “aggressor,” perpetuating fear and division. Marginalised communities have faced this kind of rhetoric for decades—familiar undertones reminiscent of the language used by former Prime Ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott. In his ABC interview, Burke specifically highlighted antisemitism on five occasions but failed to mention Islamophobia even once. Elsewhere, he characterised antisemitism as “ancient as it is vile,” asserting that the bill would “protect all Australians,” yet conspicuously omitted any reference to the persistent attacks targeting Muslims—despite knowing from the outset that the caravan threat was entirely fabricated.
Your donation matters
A Willingness
Tony Burke’s selective and strategic rhetoric suggest a willingness to use community anxieties—amplifying certain threats while conveniently ignoring others—for self-serving political advantage. His approach undermines genuine efforts to protect all Australians equally. By knowingly participating in fear-based politics and selective advocacy, Burke has undermined trust and revealed himself as a politician prepared to put personal and political interests above truth and unity.
